Why should computers not make legal decisions?

The reason that computers should not make legal decisions is primarily rooted in their inability to possess empathy and fully understand the nuances of human context in complex situations. Legal decisions often involve understanding emotions, moral considerations, and societal norms, which require a depth of human experience and judgment that computers do not have. Computers operate based on data algorithms and predefined rules, lacking the ability to consider the emotional weight or context of a case as a human judge or jury would.

While the other choices touch on aspects related to the operation of computers, such as their speed or the necessity for updates, these factors do not directly address the fundamental human elements required in legal decision-making. Legal scenarios are intricate and often involve personal experiences, ethics, and societal implications that demand a level of understanding and empathy that is beyond computational ability.