Which statement is true about pseudocode and flowcharts?

Pseudocode and flowcharts serve as tools for designing and representing algorithms and processes, each with its strengths. The statement that flowcharts can be seen as a visual counterpart to pseudocode is true because both serve the same purpose: to outline the logic of a program or algorithm in a format that is easy to understand.

Flowcharts use various shapes and arrows to illustrate the sequence of steps, decisions, and processes in a visual format. This helps convey complex logic clearly through diagrams. Pseudocode, on the other hand, is a textual representation that resembles programming code while remaining language-agnostic, allowing programmers to express algorithms in a more human-readable form. Both tools are complementary, as flowcharts offer a visual perspective, while pseudocode provides a more detailed and structured textual outline.

In contrast, the other statements do not accurately reflect the relationship between pseudocode and flowcharts. Pseudocode is useful during the algorithm design phase, well before coding is complete. Flowcharts do not completely replace the need for pseudocode; instead, they can be used together to enhance understanding of an algorithm. Additionally, pseudocode often includes more structured detail than flowcharts, which tend to focus on the flow of processes.